Ultimately, if you don't feel you are receiving the treatment you need, ask the hard questions! You can even ask for suggestions of other professionals who may be a better fit, if you so choose. They may have some general knowledge for your unique situation, but once you receive a diagnosis you feel is accurate, a specialist is best. In reality, therapists typically don't have such a broad range of things in which they truly specialize. Some therapists like to advertise themselves as well-versed in treating a variety of mental health issues. They will also know what they are looking for if there is any doubt as to your diagnosis.ĭisorders like borderline personality disorder can have significant overlap, which is why I was misdiagnosed with inattentive ADHD (then referred to as ADD) years ago. It may benefit you to consider seeing someone who specializes in the disorder, as they will be the most understanding and aware of any resources available to somebody like you. Diagnosis is often a process, and may not be instant, though insurance companies make them pencil in a diagnosis after your first visit. They should be asking you the questions themselves, not just telling you to look it up. To me, it almost sounds like your therapist is not being forthright with you in regards to their level of expertise when it comes to ADHD. My therapist and I agreed I should stop flipping through it. Diagnosing yourself is a slippery slope, and can make your anxiety go through the roof, which is what happened to me. For me personally, as a client, perusing the DSM-V was very unhealthy. It is made for professionals, not clients, and is seldom updated with newer diagnoses-C-PTSD, for example. If you would have met with a diagnosis of ADD when the DSM-IV was the standard, you would most likely fit under inattentive ADHD with the newer diagnostic criteria.īear in mind that the DSM is not the "end-all be-all", as Kati Morton (if you don't know about her, I'd recommend her content) likes to say. It has three presentations: hyperactive, inattentive, and combined. If I remember correctly, ADD was a diagnosis in the DSM-IV, and was not eliminated in the DSM-V, but reclassified. For reference I live in Canada, I’m not sure if it’s just other places that have eradicated the term ADD or.?Īlso sorry that this is so long and thank you for taking the time to read it!Īlso the threads wouldn’t load with my internet so I apologize if I’m not supposed to post on the main feed. I’m not sure it this is a “cancel culture” type thing or what, as medical professionals seem to still use the term ADD. To say I’m confused is an understatement, I was kinda relieved I might finally get a diagnosis and now it’s “not a real diagnosis”. I decided to do some of my own research out of curiosity and was a little shocked that about 80% of the articles I’ve come across said that “ADD is no longer a diagnosis” or “ADD is offensive” or “ADD doesn’t exist”. I asked her what the difference was between ADD and ADHD and she told me I’m missing the hyperactive component so she believes I have ADD. She told me that all the problems I’m having sound like ADD symptoms to her but of course it would need to be looked into further. So I’ve been talking to a psychologist for a few weeks about life & stuff when she suggested to me that she thinks I should take the DSM-5.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |